Intel 3.20GHz / 800MHz FSB "C" Pentium 4 Processors
Stephen Cooper, June 23rd, 2003
..:: FutureMark 3DMark2001SE ::..
Next up, we’ll be taking a look at FutureMark's 3DMark2001SE. With the recent debacle surrounding NVIDIA and FutureMark, I have chosen to exclude 3DMark2003 from our benchmarking suite for those of you wondering why you aren’t seeing any results for it. To start things off, we can easily see that as the processor speed increases, there is of course a performance gain. As expected, the performance gain between successive processors is much larger in the lower clock speed range. In the 32-bit resolutions, we see performance jumps of 4.3%, 3.1%, 3.2%, and finally 2.7%. For the 16-bit resolutions, we see performance gains of 4.9%, 3.2%, 3.2%, and 2.6%.
..:: SPECviewperf 7.0 ::..
Next up, let’s take a look at the results we achieved in some of the SPECviewperf 7.0 benchmarks. I chose to leave out some of the results as we started to see some graphics limitations come into play and they did not properly show the differences between processors. To start things off, let’s take a look at the results from the Proe01 benchmark. Here, we see performance gains of roughly 2.4%, 1.9%, 3.0%, and 1.0%. For the Light05 benchmark, we see performance gains of roughly 6.1%, 5.0%, 4.1%, and 4.2%. Lastly, the results we obtained from the Dx07 benchmark show performance gains of 5.5%, 4.0%, 4.2%, and finally 2.4%.
<<< Previous Page Next Page >>>
|